These days I am so workless all sorts of questions seem to prop up in my head every minute. Talk about idle's mind devil's workshop. Anyway, coming back to the topic.
We always say that absence of light is darkness. Why don't we ever say that absence of darkness is light? Therefore, I am in utter confusion as to whether light is prevalent everywhere or darkness is. There is also another view as to both darkness and light are 2 mutually exclusive entities. Please enlighten me on this.
I hope nobody has the urge to kill me on reading this.
As one of the ardent bloggers put it as a comment in my previous blog I will include my 'signature' in this blog. As usual, I thank you for your patience and please feel free to comment.
2 comments:
If you can find if egg had come first or hen had come first you can find the answer for this....
If you can answer whether tension is prevalent in very action of ur's or lack of relaxation prevalent in very behaviour of your's, you can answer this
Perfectly natural question, if you ask me...
The question similar in nature of the classic questions of advaita, which i find lacking in other philosophies- the question of devil... Typically, in all religions, devil is considered a distinct entity, separate from god and anti-god. But, god is considered omniscient, omni-potent and omni-present... Isnt this what is called in english as a "contradiction", a blatant one that too...
Coming to advaita, there is nothing called god, and there is nothing called devil too... there is only one entity - the all pervading being, brahman - the neuter. good and evil(god and devil, so to speak) are only the manifestations, or more popularly known as maya... a very clean and logical philosophy.
same is the case with light or darkness... they are but manifestations of energy... one lack of it and the other replete with it.
i rest.
ishwar.
Post a Comment